BioPharm

BioPharm October eBook: Best Practices 2018

Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/1043363

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 21 of 27

22 BioPharm International eBook October 2018 www.biopharminternational.com ÓŁÓŁ=Adobe.com Best Practices in Analytical Method Development and Testing This article discusses why it is important to apply risk analysis, QbD, and DoE in the development of analytical methods. A bout a decade ago, FDA and other reg- ulatory agencies introduced a series of pharmaceutical guidance documents that included risk management and quality by design (QbD). These initiatives were aimed at modernizing the manufacturing of small- molecule drugs and biologics. The topics on risk man- agement and QbD were published as International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guidance Q9 (1) and ICH guidance Q8 (2), respectively. Both concepts have been widely accepted by the industry within the man- ufacturing space and have been applied effectively to minimize production failure risks and define a design space where quality target product profiles can be managed and maintained. The pharmaceutical analytical community, unfor- tunately, has been rather slow in adapting these con- cepts, as well as design of experiment (DoE) (3), for in-process testing or release and stability assessment of drug substance and drug product. In this paper, the author outlines the reasons why it is important to apply risk analysis, QbD, and DoE in the development of analytical methods. MARIO DIPAOLA MARIO DIPAOLA is senior scientific director at Charles River Laboratories, Woburn, MA. Biopharma Laboratory Best Practices Analytical Methods

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of BioPharm - BioPharm October eBook: Best Practices 2018