Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/116863
References, cont. Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. Heck, A. L., & Herrick, S. M. (2007). Geriatric considerations in restoration of competence to stand trial: Two cases of impaired cognition. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7, 73-82. Heilbrun, K., Marczyk, G.R., DeMatteo, D., Zillmer, E.A., Harris, J., & Jennings, T. (2003). Principles of forensic mental health assessment: Implications for neuropsychological assessment in forensic contexts. Assessment, 10(4), 329 ��� 343. Indiana v. Davis, 898 N.E.2d.281. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972). Kaufmann, P. M. (2008). Admissibility of neuropsychological evidence in criminal cases: Competency, insanity, culpability, and mitigation. In R. L. Denney & J. T. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford, pp 55-90. Lewis, J. L., Simcox, A. M.,, & Berry, D. T. R. (2002). Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI���2 and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Psychological Assessment, 14, 170���176 Marcopulos, B. A., Morgan, J. & Denney, R. L. (2008). Neuropsychological evaluation of competency to proceed. In R. L. Denney & J. T. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford, pp. 176-203. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C. Canyock, E., M. & Condit, D.C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1102. Mossman, D. (2007). Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 35, 34���43. NAN Membership Drive 2013 Support the great work that NAN does! Recruit New Members and WIN PRIZES Nestor, P.G., Daggett, D., Haycock, J., & Price, M. (1999). Competence to stand trial: A neuropsychological inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 397 ��� 412. Pirelli, G., Gottdiener, W.H., Zapf, P.A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 17(1), 1 ��� 53. Reichenberg, A., Harvey, P.D., Bowie, C.R., Mojtabai, R., Rabinowitz, J., Heaton, R.K., & Bromet, E. (2009). Neuropsychological function and dysfunction in schizophrenia and psychotic affective disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35, 1022-1029. Taylor, P. J. & Kopelman, M. D. (1984). Amnesia for criminal offences. Psychological Medicine, 14, 581-588. Tussey, C. M., & Marcopulos, B. A. (2012). Criminal forensic neuropsychological evaluations and implications for schizophrenia. In Clinical neuropsychological foundations of schizophrenia. New York: Psychology Press. Warren, J., Fitch, L., Dietz, P. and Rosenfeld, B. (1991). Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psychological opinion: An analysis of 894 pretrial referrals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 63-69. Wynkoop, T. F. & Denney, R. L. (1999). Exaggeration of neuropsychological deficit in competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 29-53. Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., Gabel, J., & Munizza, J. (2007). An evaluation of malingering screens with Competency to Stand Trial patients: A knowngroups comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 249-260. Zanelli, J., Reichenberg, A., Morgan, K., Fearon, P, Kravariti E., Dazzanm P., Morgan, C., Zanelli, C., Demjaha, A., Jones, P.B., Doody, G.A., Kapur, S., & Murray, R.M. (2010). Specific and generalized neuropsychological deficits: A comparison of patients with various first-episode psychosis presentations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 78-85. Zapf, P.A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial. Best Practices in Forensic Mental Health Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. Each quarter the three members who recruit the most new members will receive valuable prizes. First prize each quarter is worth at least $100. The top three recruiters for the year will also receive prizes, with the first place prize worth at least $200. All winners will be announced in the NAN Newsflashes and at the Annual Conference. Questions? Contact Dr. Fred Kadushin, Chair NAN Membership Committee. Sponsors include: Meyers Neuropsychological Battery, NAN DistanCE Bulletin vol. 27 no. 1 | 23