BioPharm International - March 2021

BioPharm International - Regulatory Sourcebook - March 2021

Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/1354372

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 47

10 BioPharm International eBook March 2021 www.biopharminternational.com macological properties, Panagoulias says. She explains that PRISM is also a learning and improving platform, which allows users to discover and leverage many different design prin- ciples, the intent being to fine-tune each oligonucleotide for the disease target. "For example," she notes, "we recently announced new chemistry modifications, called 'PN backbone chemistry modifications,' which were discovered through PRISM and have been shown preclinically to improve potency, exposure, and durability across our silencing, splic- ing, and editing modalities." ADVANCING COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL The progress of ASOs from the research bench to viable therapeu- tic candidates has more to do with industry transforming its view of ASOs from one of the potential lim- itations to a view that realizes their opportunities, says Templin. "For ASOs, the recent wave of regulatory approvals and commercial launches has resulted in greater attention by researchers, the drug development community, and investors," he states. Moreover, the ASO field has had its share of spotlight moments over the last several years, but, neverthe- less, it can be easy to review a man- uscript or even a single approval and conclude it is an isolated event. "A major difference now, versus when the first ASOs were approved, is the depth of knowledge that has accumulated over the last three to four decades, even more so in the last 10 years," Templin remarks. " W h i le que st ion s r e m a i n for the field, there are pathways for- ward. For example, there has been extensive investment in chemis- try to provide greater stability and increase activity. Specialized routes of administration, such as intrathe- cal for central nervous system-based diseases, have been shown to be well tolerated and provide thera- peutic benefit," he adds. Templin also explains that there has been a careful and well-thought selection of indications for which ASOs provide a unique approach to a previously unmet medical need. "Thus, maturity of the ASO field is not a 'just now' situation; it is more consistent with success providing a basis for an in-depth investigation into the drug class. Once a deeper dive is taken, the scope and potential of an ASO can be recognized and the future for all oligonucleotide-based therapeutics better understood and appreciated," he states. Recent reg ulator y approvals, with eight novel ASO compounds having been approved since 2016, have likely influenced perceptions around the emergence of oligonu- cleotide therapies as a promising new class of drugs, Panagoulias adds. She points out that, in fact, the first oligonucleotide approval in the United States occurred over 20 years ago when FDA approved fomivirsen for treating cytomegalovirus retinitis in immunocompromised patients (6). "That experience has only contin- ued to grow. Therefore, ASOs have been around for some time but the recent successes in developing these therapies in the US gives one the impression that the viability of the class was only recently established," Panagoulias states. BENEFIT OF GUIDANCE Although FDA's new ASO draft guid- ance is directed to sponsor-investi- gators who are considering how to develop an ASO for a specific indi- vidual patient, the benefit may yet extend to research foundations and/ or family/patient sponsored pro- grams, Templin observes. Realistic approaches for individualized treat- ments are recent, he notes, and the play book for these approaches is still being formulated. As described in the draft guidance, a primary objective is to outline the impor- tance of early communications between FDA and the sponsor-in- vestigator, and the guidance sug- gests ways to expedite and formalize these communications, he says. "The draft guidance also outlines the expectations for the program, most notable are nonclinical stud- ies, appropriate CMC for product quality, and clinical reporting. It will be the initial talks on the estab- lishment of a communication plan, and the agreement on expectations, that will determine how a program can progress from basic research to treatment in a rapid and efficient manner while assuring patient safety," Templin says. Panagoulias notes that the guid- ance might be of use to commercial sponsors and manufacturers, beyond those developing "N=1" medicines, if it included more insights on the spe- cific content requirements for these submissions. In particular, it would benefit sponsors and manufacturers to have specific requirements out- lined for regulatory expectations on preclinical studies to assess safety (species and duration) and informa- tion on CMC (e.g., stability) as these data could be extrapolated for use in supporting INDs for ultra-rare populations or very small subsets of genetic diseases, she concludes. REFERENCES 1. FDA, IND Submissions for Individualized Antisense Oligonucleotide Drug Products: Administrative and Procedural Recommendations Guidance for Sponsor- Investigators (CDER, January 2021). 2. ICH, "ICH Guidelines," ich.org, accessed Feb. 23, 2021. 3. ICH M3(R2) Guidance on Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals, Step 4 version (2009). 4. Berman, et al., Nucleic Acid Therapeutics 26 (2) 73–85 (2016). 5. FDA, "FDA Approves First Drug for Spinal Muscular Atrophy," Press Release, Dec. 23, 2016. 6. FDA, Approval Letter to Isis Pharmaceuticals, Aug. 26, 1998. BP Regulatory Sourcebook Quality

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of BioPharm International - March 2021 - BioPharm International - Regulatory Sourcebook - March 2021