Specialty Food Magazine

Fall 2020

Specialty Food Magazine is the leading publication for retailers, manufacturers and foodservice professionals in the specialty food trade. It provides news, trends and business-building insights that help readers keep their businesses competitive.

Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/1287173

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 66 of 74

O ne would think that a global pandemic might quiet the Prop 65 litigation in California. Think again. In March 2020, 350 notices of intent to sue were filed, according to the California Attorney General's office. In April, 243 cases were filed. That compares to an average of 208 cases per month over the past three years. "Prop 65 has an attorney's fee provision that encourages lawyers to file cases, settle, and then file again," said Sophia Castillo, an attorney with Downey Brand in San Francisco, during the Specialty Food Association's monthly regulatory call on July 13. The law, adopted in 1986, allows "any person in the public interest" to bring a case. There have been 30,000 Prop 65 notices filed since 1988 and there appears to be no end in sight. Good Intentions Prop 65 was championed as a means to encourage corporations to "clean up" their act. Originally entitled the "Safe Drinking and Toxic Enforcement Act," it was passed by California voters in 1986 by a 63 percent to 37 percent margin and has been part of the California litigation landscape ever since. By requiring all companies that make products with cancer-causing elements to warn consumers, the belief was that companies would reformulate products so that they did not have to post the warning, "known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm." More than 900 chemical and other elements are now on the Prop 65 list. It affects industries ranging from food manufacturers to parking garages to candlemakers to fly fishing lure creators. The chemicals of significance to the food and beverage industry include lead, acrylamide, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. And court action continues to increase. Since 2018, there have been 829 Prop 65 settlements totaling more than $35 million, according to the California Attorney General's office. The state estimates that approximately 75 percent of the settlements go to plaintiff's attorneys. In August 2018, California issued new requirements for the warning label as follows: Prop 65 Update: Enhanced Activity During the Pandemic BY RON TANNER WARNING SPECIALTY FOOD SPECIALTYFOOD.COM SPECIALTY FOOD MAKER

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Specialty Food Magazine - Fall 2020