Pharmaceutical Technology - May 2021

Pharmaceutical Technology - Biologics and Sterile Drug Manufacturing - May 2021

Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/1373953

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 63

16 Pharmaceutical Technology BIOLOGICS AND STERILE DRUG MANUFACTURING EBOOK 2021 P h a r mTe c h . c o m Manufacturing towards ready-to-use containers and sophisticated packaging components, such as on-body devices. When producing small quantities, filling, process design, and quality concepts present pharmaceutical services providers with new challenges. For example: given the small amount of available API, fixed line losses mean sub-optimal yield; packaging configura- tions might be more varied; [and] fill-weigh checks of 100% of containers are needed as in-process sampling might not provide the right level of process control and is also destructive and costly. The filling system for small commercial-batch quantities needs to be ad- justable with quick decontamination, aeration, and product and format changeover, all in accordance with international regulatory requirements. PharmTech: What are some of the considerations for choosing the type of cleanroom equipment for fill/finish? Zimmermann (Vetter): Given the individual ben- efits of isolators and restricted access barrier systems (RABS), the technology best utilized is largely depen- dent upon the manufacturer´s portfolio and business strategy. Isolators are often considered the best solu- tion for a high sterility assurance level. They employ a fully sealed unit entirely 'isolated' from the outside environment and rely on a reproducible, automatic, and extensive biodecontamination process. Usually, an isolator requires a fairly long downtime for product changeovers, which makes it best suited for large-scale runs of single products. RABS, on the other hand, involves barrier and dy- namic airflow separation between the environment and drug product. Thus, the system offers the ad- vantage of faster setup and efficient product change- over. The key, however, is to operate the RABS with the barrier doors closed at all times. As RABS are usually situated in a class B cleanroom, there is an additional layer of protection. This distinction al- lows for a higher utilization and f lexibility when running multiple products. The long-term vision for small-batch manufac- turing is shifting from a human-centered produc- tion towards a fully automatic process with robotic equipment to reduce as much as possible any risk to the product. With the small footprint for such commercial batch sizes, isolator-type technology might be best suited for this use. Both systems offer opportunities and challenges. Ultimately, the chosen type of cleanroom technol- ogy is one that best addresses the individual needs of the divergent product requirements as well as a high level of performance that meets strict regula- tory and customer requirements. Technology developments PharmTech: What are some recent technology devel- opments in aseptic filling? Zimmermann (Vetter): Over the past few decades, the technology for aseptic fill/finish has continued to evolve. Developments in cleanroom technology— both with isolators and RABS—are mainly directed to a higher automation of processes for providing ad- ditional sterility assurance and new technologies with sufficient integrated versatility to anticipate future re- quirements for format, packaging, and filling. "The vision for small-batch manufacturing is shifting to a fully automatic process with robotic equipment to reduce risk to the product." —Joerg Zimmermann,Vetter

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Pharmaceutical Technology - May 2021 - Pharmaceutical Technology - Biologics and Sterile Drug Manufacturing - May 2021