Tablets & Capsules

TC0719

Issue link: https://www.e-digitaleditions.com/i/1138630

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 66 of 67

Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) has safely been used as a pigment in thousands of food and drug prod- ucts all over the world for more than fifty years. Known in Europe and many other parts of the world as E171, TiO 2 is commonly used in solid oral dosage forms and topical drug products as well as in various liquid drug products where some opacity is desired. In a September 2016 opin- ion, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the available safety information for E171 and communicated no con- cerns about its continued use as a food additive. However, EFSA did call for additional data to com- plete their review and fill in some gaps related to modern toxicol- ogy and analytical standards that didn't exist when E171 was ini- tially approved. EFSA stated that the data was needed to facilitate the development of an accept- a b l e d a i l y i n t a k e ( A D I ) . T h e Titanium Dioxide Manufacturers Association (TDMA) commit- ted to EFSA to provide the data requested by August 2019. In 2017, the French Agency f o r F o o d E n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) published an opinion on a new paper from the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (the Bettini study). The agency concluded that the find- ings did not allow ANSES to question the EFSA opinion on the safety of E171 as a food additive. However, since the authors of the Bettini study alleged that E171 may have potential adverse health effects, the French government asked the European Commission to request EFSA to further assess the Bettini study and three other studies that had been published after EFSA's 2016 opinion. EFSA finalized its assessment in June 2018, concluding that the four studies do not merit EFSA chang- ing its existing opinion that E171 is safe. While the Bettini study has significant design flaws that ren- der its conclusions questionable, based on requests from France, EFSA updated its call for data to include additional studies inves- tigating the concerns raised in B e t t i n i . T D M A c o m m i t t e d t o perform these additional studies but indicated that the final results could not be provided to EFSA until July 2020. EFSA agreed to this new deadline. Despite this agreement, France is suspending the marketing of foods containing E171 beginning January 1, 2020 for one year. The justification for the suspension is that the studies required to set the ADI won't be completed by the August 2019 deadline, though it was the French government's request for more data that created the delay. In May 2019, at the annu al m e e t i n g o f t h e E U S t a n d i n g Commit tee on Plants, Animals, F o o d a n d F e e d ( S C o PA F F ), F r a n c e pr e s e nt e d it s c a s e for an EU-wide suspension of E171 in foods. W hile the commit tee made no f inal decisions dur ing the meeting, most member states appeared to prefer a harmonized a p p r o a c h t h r o u g h o u t E u r o p e a n d f o r F r a n c e t o p o s t p o n e s u s p e n d i n g E171 u n t i l a f t e r EFSA's final opinion in 2020. The EU member states now have to decide if they will formally object to France's proposed suspension a n d p o t e n t i a l l y p r e v e n t i t s implementation. While EFSA's opinion is that E171 is safe and no actions need to be taken until after the new studies are completed and assessed in 2020, the outcome remains uncertain, and E171 is a politi- cally sensitive topic in France. Some French consumer groups are calling for the planned sus- pension to extend beyond foods to pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. This would cause significant prob- lems for the availability of drug products in France, since there is no good alternative with similar properties to E171, and reformu- lating drug products containing E171 could take significant time. Such reformulations would also likely reduce product shelf lives and result in different colors for all existing products, which would cause patient confusion. The sig- nificant cost implications may also cause some companies to no lon- ger supply their drug products to France, which could create long- term drug shortages. One can only hope that sci- e n c e w i l l p r e v a i l a n d t h a t a "perceived" safety problem isn't allowed to create chaos while pro- viding no additional benefit to patient safety. T&C David R. Schoneker is vice chair of science and regulatory policy at IPEC-Americas. b a c k p a g e Current discussions in Europe regarding titanium dioxide safety

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Tablets & Capsules - TC0719